<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: canon eos 50d lens question?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canoneos50ddigitalslr.com/canon-eos-50d/canon-eos-50d-lens-question/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canoneos50ddigitalslr.com/canon-eos-50d/canon-eos-50d-lens-question</link>
	<description>Canon EOS 50D &#124; Reviews &#124; Technical Info. &#124; Comments &#124; Videos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 02:46:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dude</title>
		<link>http://www.canoneos50ddigitalslr.com/canon-eos-50d/canon-eos-50d-lens-question/comment-page-1#comment-2650</link>
		<dc:creator>dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canoneos50ddigitalslr.com/canon-eos-50d/canon-eos-50d-lens-question#comment-2650</guid>
		<description>if you can afford it, 
get just the 50d body only and
get the Canon 17-55 2.8. The problem is that the lense is around $1k
another alternative would be the Tamron 17-50 2.8.
The Tamron is a good lens, but many say that the image quality is not as good as the Canon 17-55, but for about $400-$500, it&#039;s a good lens. &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you can afford it,<br />
get just the 50d body only and<br />
get the <a href="http://www.canoneos50ddigitalslr.com/amazon" style="color:#0033FF;text-decoration:underline;" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" onmouseover="self.status='Canon EOS 50D Amazon.com';return true;" onmouseout="self.status=''">Canon</a> 17-55 2.8. The problem is that the lense is around $1k<br />
another alternative would be the Tamron 17-50 2.8.<br />
The Tamron is a good lens, but many say that the image quality is not as good as the Canon 17-55, but for about $400-$500, it&#8217;s a good lens. <br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R</title>
		<link>http://www.canoneos50ddigitalslr.com/canon-eos-50d/canon-eos-50d-lens-question/comment-page-1#comment-2649</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canoneos50ddigitalslr.com/canon-eos-50d/canon-eos-50d-lens-question#comment-2649</guid>
		<description>for the little extra cash over the body alone, the 50d kit with the 17-85 lens is a great deal.

Any lenses you buy beyond the kit lens are better to have a Canon EF mount rather than an EF-S mount just to keep your options open for the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for the little extra cash over the body alone, the 50d kit with the 17-85 lens is a great deal.</p>
<p>Any lenses you buy beyond the kit lens are better to have a Canon EF mount rather than an EF-S mount just to keep your options open for the future.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre M</title>
		<link>http://www.canoneos50ddigitalslr.com/canon-eos-50d/canon-eos-50d-lens-question/comment-page-1#comment-2648</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canoneos50ddigitalslr.com/canon-eos-50d/canon-eos-50d-lens-question#comment-2648</guid>
		<description>The camera doesnt just come with one lens, thats the beauty of an SLR, interchangeable lenses.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The camera doesnt just come with one lens, thats the beauty of an SLR, interchangeable lenses.<br /><b>References : </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fhotoace</title>
		<link>http://www.canoneos50ddigitalslr.com/canon-eos-50d/canon-eos-50d-lens-question/comment-page-1#comment-2647</link>
		<dc:creator>fhotoace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canoneos50ddigitalslr.com/canon-eos-50d/canon-eos-50d-lens-question#comment-2647</guid>
		<description>Are you talking the &quot;stock&quot; 18-55 mm or newest 18-200 mm?

For the money any Canon lens it excellent ... and they will last for decades.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;proFotog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you talking the &#8220;stock&#8221; 18-55 mm or newest 18-200 mm?</p>
<p>For the money any Canon lens it excellent &#8230; and they will last for decades.<br /><b>References : </b><br />proFotog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
